SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN, K.C.MAMGAIN
Kapardi Straw Boards – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Guntur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C. Sarabeswara Rao,B.R. Jagadish

ORDER

Per K.C. Mamgain : This appeal is filed by M/s. Kapardi Straw Boards against Order-in-Appeal No. 66/01 (G) CE dtd. 19.09.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad.

2. Shri Sarabeswara Rao, Consultant appearing for the appellant, stated that appellants are manufacturers of straw boards falling under Sub-Heading No. 4807.92 of the Central Excise Tariff Act and they were availing benefit of Notification No. 7/97-CE dtd. 1.3.97 which was replaced by Notfn. No. 16/97 dtd. 1.4.97. The Assistant Commissioner without passing any order on their declaration under Rule 173B directed them to pay duty at tariff rate without any exemption for all clearances after Rs. 1 crore on the ground that Notfn. No. 4/97-CE specifically excludes the exemption thereunder to parties who were availing exemption under Notfn. No. 16/97. They made a representation vide their letter dtd. 26.11.97 to the Assistant Commissioner. However, the Assistant Commissioner vide his letter dtd. 19.12.97 informed them that Notfn. No. 4/97 is conditional notification which restricts availment of benefit under Notfn. No. 16/97 under conditions 13 or 14. The unit has to pay effective tariff rate o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top