SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.AGRAWAL, P.G.CHACKO
IVRCL Infrastructures & Projects Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Chennai (SEA) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.L. Kumaran, Ravi Raghvan,V. Valte

ORDER

Per P.G. Chacko : The appellants filed Bill of Entry (for home consumption) No. 369413 dated 28.12.2001 through CHA for clearance of imported goods from Germany declared as HOT MIX PLANT BATCH TYPE WITH ELECTRONIC CONTROLS AND BAG TYPE FILTER ARRANGEMENT 160 TONS PER HOUR CAPACITY valued at DM 5,50,000/-. Clearance was sought under Customs Tariff Heading 8474.80 at 'nil' rate under Notification No. 17/2001-Cus. dated 1.3.2001. The Notification vide Serial No. 217 thereof granted full exemption from basic customs duty and additional customs duty, to goods of Chapter 84 specified in List-11, required for construction of roads. The first among the 21 items specified in List-11 under the Notification was "Hot mix plant batch type with electronic controls and bag type filter arrangements, more than 120 Tons per hour capacity." The exemption, allowed to the goods specified in the list, was subject to Condition No. 38 stipulated in the Notification. This condition reads:

If-

(a) the goods are imported by-

(i) The Ministry of Surface Transport, or

(ii) a person who has been awarded a contract for the construction of roads in India by or on behalf of the Ministry of Surface Transport, by t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top