SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN, T.K.JAYARAMAN
Dell Computer India (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pramod Banthia, S. Madhavan,R.V. Ramakrishnappa

ORDER

Per T.K. Jayaraman:

M/s. Dell Computer India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the appellant'), a 100% E.O.U. under the Software Technology Park Scheme of Government of India, are aggrieved over the fact that the impugned Order-in-Appeal denies the benefit of exemption Notification No. 52/2003-Cus. dated 31.3.2003 in respect of 'Master Key for Security Lock'.

2. Shri Prarmod Banthia, learned Chartered Accountant and Shri S. Madhavan, learned Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellants and Shri R.V. Ramakrishnappa, JDR appeared on behalf of the Revenue.

3. We have gone through the records and also heard the parties. The Commissioner (Appeals) in his order has clearly recorded that the imported item is mentioned in the Annexure to the Notification. Further, he has stated that the item cannot be said to be used in the manufacture for development of software, data entry and conversion, data processing, data analysis, etc. On this ground, the benefit of the exemption notification has been denied. We have gone through the technical literature. There are different types of security system. The following extract from the technical literature gives an idea about the function of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top