SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ARCHANA WADHWA, RAKESH KUMAR
Arun International – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajiv Tuli,Ranjan Khanna

ORDER

Rakesh Kumar, Technical Member - The facts leading to filing of this appeal are, in brief, as under:—

1.1 The appellant are manufacturers of stainless steel utensils from S.S. Flats. The stainless steel utensils during the period of dispute were fully exempt from duty and, therefore, the appellant had not taken central excise registration. The period of dispute in this case is from 31.12.2002 to 31.03.2003 and during this period, they exported stainless steel utensils under claim for rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 of the excise duty paid on the inputs used in the manufacture of the stainless steel utensils. The rebate claims totaling Rs.9,26,000/- were rejected by the Asstt. Commissioner vide order-in-original dated 13.11.2004 on the ground that the input duty rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was subject to following the condition and the procedure prescribed in this regard, under Notification No. 41/2001-CE(NT), dated 26.06.2001 read with Notification No. 42/2001-CE (NT) dated 26.06.2001 and the procedure for claiming rebate was not followed by the appellant inasmuch as the appellant neither made the required input output ratio dec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top