SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAKESH KUMAR, S.K.MOHANTY
U. P. Pumps (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Krishnan,M.S. Negi

ORDER

Rakesh Kumar, Technical Member - The appellants are manufacturers of treadle pumps, which are feet operated pumps, which can lift water from the depth up to 7 Mtrs. and are normally used for minor irrigation purposes for lifting water from beneath or surface water ponds, canals or rivers. The dispute is about classification of this product. According to the Department, the Treadle pumps are classifiable under sub-heading No. 8413.80 of the Tariff as "other pumps for liquids", which according to the appellants, these pumps are meant for minor irrigation purposes and are correctly classifiable as "mechanical appliances of a kind used in agricultural or horticulture" under Heading No. 8424.10 of the Tariff. Vide order-in-original dated 16-1-2004 passed by the jurisdictional Asst. Commissioner, the treadle pumps were classified under Heading 8413.80. The appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) against this decision of the Asstt. Commissioner and the Commissioner (Appeals) vide order-in-appeal dated 22-8-2005 upheld the classification of the treadle pump under sub-heading No. 8413.80. Against this order of the Commissioner, this appeal has been filed.

2. Heard bo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top