Back
K.SANKARARAMAN, T.P.NAMBIAR
Orissa Synthetics Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
K. Sankararaman, Member (T)
1. The Miscellaneous Applications and two Stay Applications filed by the Applicants involve a common issue and are taken up together after hearing common arguments by the learned consultant Shri Gopal Prasad on their behalf and by Shri N.K. Mandal, learned Departmental Representative on behalf of the respondent Collector.
2. Miscellaneous Application 106/93 filed on 8-6-1993 is for the early hearing of the Stay Petition. This is allowed and the case posted accordingly.
3. Miscellaneous Applications 184/93 and 185/93 filed on 8-9-1993 contain the plea that the Stay Petitions filed by them may be heard by this Bench notwithstanding the fact that the amounts demanded in terms of the two impugned orders of the Collector of Central Excise have already been recovered by the departmental authorities by debit to their RG 23A Part II Account. Copy of the order dated 6-9-1993 passed by the Honourable Orissa High Court passed on the petition filed by the present applicants before as has been enclosed with the applications. The High Court has observed that the action of the Superintendent of Central Excise, debiting the amount in question from their account will n
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
