R.JAYARAMAN, P.K.DESAI
Bajaj Tempo Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Pune – Respondent
R. Jayaraman, Member (T)
1. All the three appeals listed above involve consideration of the same issues and hence were heard together. The appeals are against the Orders-in-Appeal indicated against each as below:
2.1 Appeal No. 300/93 is against the order-in-appeal No. P-64/93 dated 18-3-1993 passed by Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune, Appeal Nos. 298/93
2.2 The issue common to all the three appeals can be briefly stated as below : The appellants M/s. Bajaj Tempo are manufacturer of Motor Vehicles. They have more than one manufacturing unit. They receive inputs under Modvat scheme in respect of materials, which they utilise in the manufacture of Motor Vehicle parts and I.C. Engines. These motor vehicle parts and I.C. Engines are partly utilised in the further manufacture of motor vehicles in the same factory and partly sent under Chapter X Procedure for further utilisation in the manufacture of motor vehicles in another unit belonging to the appellants, in terms of exemption Notice 217/86 dated 2-4-1986 as amended by Notification 97/89 dated 1-3-1989.
2.3 The appella
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.