SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.KALYANAM, V.P.GULATI
Murugappa Morganite Ceramic Fibres Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Raghavan,J.P. Gregory

ORDER

V.P. Gulati, Member (T)

1. This appeal is against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras. The issue involved in the appeal relates to eligibility to MODVAT credit in respect of Molybdenum plates and Tungsten nozzles. The learned lower appellate authority has held that MODVAT credit is not available in respect of the two items in view of the proviso to Rule 57A under which machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing of any goods are not considered as inputs for the purpose of MODVAT credit Under Rule 57A and that the two items are in the nature of apparatus or appliances. The learned lower appellate authority has also relied upon the decision of the West Regional Bench in the case of Mukund Iron and Steel Works Ltd. v. C.C.E., reported in MANU/CM/0001/1989 : 1990 (45) E.L.T. 84 (Tri.) and has referred to the observation of the Tribunal in that case that the materials which are required for effective functioning and maintenance of the machinery would stand excluded from the purview of the MODVAT Scheme. Adverting to the use of the two items, the learned lower appellate authority has entered the fol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top