G.P.AGARWAL, N.K.BAJPAI
Creative Cosmetics – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
N.K. Bajpai, Member (T)
1. This is an appeal against the orders of the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara demanding duty of excise under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 on 564.5 dozen lipsticks valued at Rs. 54,192/- removed without payment of duty by the appellants during the period from 1-4-83 to 4-5-83 and imposing penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on them under Rule 173 Q(l) of the Central Excise Rules.
2. Briefly stated, the facts are that during a visit to the appellants' premises on 13-8-1983, the Preventive Officers of Vadodara Central Excise Collectorate Headquarters noticed that the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of Lipsticks falling under Item 14F of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. They were also manufacturing D-O-Dur Air Freshener falling under Item 68 on job work basis on behalf of M/s. Shingar Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd., Vapi. It came to light that M/s. Topiwala Trust were the proprietors of the appellants as well as of M/s. Ideal Cosmetics Corporation which was also situated in GIDC, Vapi near the Gunjan Cinema. The lipsticks as well as Air Fresheners manufactured in the factory of the appellants were sold through a distributor
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.