SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, S.V.MARUTHI
Tungbhadra Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Beri,Prabhat Kumar

ORDER

S.V. Maruthi, Member (J)

1. These two appeals are disposed of by a common order as the appeals arose out of a common order of the Collector (Appeals).

2. The dispute relates to the allowability of certain deductions claimed by the appellants.

3. The appellants M/s Tungbhadra Industries Ltd. entered into an agreement with M/s. Indexport Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Hindustan Lever Ltd., Bombay for manufacture on its behalf two brands of Soaps, namely Sunlight and Lifebuoy. Indexport issued an authorisation under Notification No. 305/77 dtd. 5-11-1977. All the materials required for manufacture of the said soaps were supplied to the appellants by Indexport and the appellants received processing charges for conversion of raw materials into finished goods at a specified rate per unit of production. In terms of the agreement entered into between the appellant and Indexport, the price at which the goods will be sold by Indexport is the basis for the determination of the assessable value for the levy of excise duty.

4. The appellants filed price lists claiming the following deductions :

1. Turnover tax;

2. Cost of special secondary packing;

3. Freight incurred in movement of finished

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top