SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN
Subhash Woollen Mills (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs – Respondent


ORDER

S.L. Peeran, Member (J)

1. The appellants are importers of woollen rags. They had imported 50 bales containing 18,988 Kgs. of woollen rags per s.s.v/Bhakti valued at Rs. 1,25,168 CIF for bill of entry No. 500/80. The importers claimed clearance of the imported goods under OGL. The Customs House did not consider the goods to be falling under OGL for the following reasons-

(i) The goods had been declared as woollen rags. On examination of the goods, it was found that 60% of this consignment is synthetic rags and balance 40% as woollen rags. The department contended that the effective rate of duty on synthetic rags is 80% as against 20% on woollen rags. Hence, the importers were charged for misdeclaration of description of goods and held the same to be confiscable under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962;

(ii) The rags were not in completely pre-mutilated condition as required under para 37 in Appendix 6 AM/85-88 Policy. It was alleged by the department that the goods were cut into two pieces which could be economically restitched and hence, the goods could not be treated as pre-mutilated goods. Therefore, these goods were held to be liable for confiscation under Section 11

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top