SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.K.DESAI
Chloride Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Sridharan,B.P. Singh

ORDER

P.K. Desai, Member (J)

1. This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Original No. 44/CEX/1991 dt. 2-11-1991 of the Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune, dropping the duty demand holding the same as barred by limitation but imposing penalty of Rs. 25,000/- vide Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

2. The appellants are the manufacturers of Electric storage batteries and have opted for availment of duty credit under the MODVAT Scheme. For the purpose of manufacture of their final products, they purchased duty paid lead ingots and availed of credit for duty paid thereon. During the manufacturing process, substantial quantity of waste and scrap arose, which initially they cleared availing the benefit of exemption vide Notification No. 33/81. As per their claim, at a later stage, they however, realised that such a waste and scrap could be utilised for manufacture of Batteries after conversion into ingots and hence under the general permission obtained for the removal of ingot vide Rule 57F of the Rules, they started removing the waste and scrap, following procedure laid down under Rule 57F(2) of the Rules, to the job-workers who converted the scrap and waste into i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top