SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, JYOTI BALASUNDARAM
Bengal Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K. Banerjee,L. Narasimha Murthy

ORDER

Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)

1. Both appeals involve common issues and are hence disposed of by a common order. The classification of "Phenols" manufactured by the appellants is to be determined herein - whether it falls under heading No. 3003.20 of the CET1985 as a medicament (as claimed by the appellants) or under heading No. 3801.90 as a disinfectant (as held by the lower authorities). The appellants state that the product is manufactured under a drug licence issued by the Directorate of Drug Control, Govt. of West Bengal and has been certified as a "drug" within the meaning of Section 3(b) of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 - It is manufactured by mixing more than 2 constituents, namely, coal tar oil, resin, castor oil etc. & has prophylactic use and therefore has the essential characteristic of medicament within the meaning assigned to it under Note 2 to Chapter 30 of the CET 1985.

2. We have heard Shri K.K. Banerjee, learned advocate and Shri L.N. Murthy, learned DR.

3. Section 3(b) of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 defines drug as :-

"(b) "drug" includes -

(i) all medicines for internal or external use of human beings or animals and all substances intended to be used fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top