D.C.MANDAL, G.P.AGARWAL, JYOTI BALASUNDARAM
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Dewarance Macneill and Company Ltd. – Respondent
D.C. Mandal, Member (T)
1. The issues to be decided by us in this appeal are:
(i) Whether asbestos products, namely,
(a) Sleeve Packing
(b) Hexagonal Packing Ring
(c) Indurated Asbestos
are correctly classifiable under Item 68 or Item 22F of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff; and
(ii) The demand for differential duty under Item 22F and Item 68 can be demanded under Section 11A for a period of six months prior to the issue of the show cause notice dated 20.5.1983.
2. The facts of the case have been stated in the statement of facts given in the memorandum of appeal filed by the Revenue. In short, the same are as follows:
(a) The respondents filed classification list in Form I dated 25.9.1975 to the proper officer for classification of the above mentioned three products under Item 68 of the Central Excise. Tariff. The classification list was approved by the proper officer and the respondents cleared the goods on payment of duty under the said Tariff Item 68. Subsequently, chemical test of the three products revealed predominance of asbestos fibres in the composition of the said goods. The Department issued a show cause notice dated 20.5.1983 proposing to re-classify the goods under Tar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.