P.C.JAIN, S.V.MARUTHI
Agra Metallurgical Engineers (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
P.C. Jain, Member (T)
1. Shri Kunhikrishnan, learned consultant in this stay application praya for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of Rs. 49,532.41P. demanded in the order-in-original by the Asstt. Collector and confirmed by the Collector (Appeals) in the impugned order. Shri Kunhikrishnan states that the reason for demand is that the bottom and top covers manufactured by them for Usha Ceiling Fans carries the brand name 'Usha'. He submits that this brand name was not affixed by them. The learned consultant states that this brand name is already there when they purchase the casting of bottom and top covers from the market. In these circumstances provisions contained in para-7 of notification No. 175/86 will not be attracted in this case. He also submits that this plea was taken before the lower authorities but they have not dealt with it at all. Shri Kunhikrishnan stales further that the proprietor of the applicant firm is a self employed engineer and is also not in a position to pay the aforesaid amount of duty in view of his poor financial condition. However, no evidence regarding the financial condition has been submitted by the learned consultant.
2. Opposing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.