SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, S.V.MARUTHI
Agra Metallurgical Engineers (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.V. Kunhikrishnan,S.K. Sharma

JUDGEMENT

P.C. Jain, Member (T)

1. Shri Kunhikrishnan, learned consultant in this stay application praya for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of Rs. 49,532.41P. demanded in the order-in-original by the Asstt. Collector and confirmed by the Collector (Appeals) in the impugned order. Shri Kunhikrishnan states that the reason for demand is that the bottom and top covers manufactured by them for Usha Ceiling Fans carries the brand name 'Usha'. He submits that this brand name was not affixed by them. The learned consultant states that this brand name is already there when they purchase the casting of bottom and top covers from the market. In these circumstances provisions contained in para-7 of notification No. 175/86 will not be attracted in this case. He also submits that this plea was taken before the lower authorities but they have not dealt with it at all. Shri Kunhikrishnan stales further that the proprietor of the applicant firm is a self employed engineer and is also not in a position to pay the aforesaid amount of duty in view of his poor financial condition. However, no evidence regarding the financial condition has been submitted by the learned consultant.

2. Opposing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top