SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.KALYANAM, V.P.GULATI
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Bimetal Bearings Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. Sundararaju

ORDER

V.P. Gulati, Member (T)

1. This appeal is against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras. The Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore is aggrieved of the decision of the learned Collector (Appeals) in allowing the benefit of MODVAT Credit in respect of anti-rust oil and electroplating salts. The learned Collector (Appeals) has held as under :

"On going through the above submission, I find that the usage of chemicals is more or less akin to the usage of Rust Preventive oil, which the lower authority has considered as an input, equating it to paint. While the anti-rust preventive oil is used to keep the fully manufactured bearings free from rust, the chemicals are used during the course of manufacture of Bearing themselves. The chemicals are claimed to constitute a plated overlay on bearings, which is nothing but equivalent to quoting with paint. Their usage over a period of time is of no consequence. Therefore, chemicals can hardly be termed as "Capital Goods" and equated to surface grinders. Moreover, the term "capital goods" would apply on lay to "goods" capable of producing goods. The impugned order being one based on a ground which cannot be sustained,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top