SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, JYOTI BALASUNDARAM
Essel Packaging Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S. Aggarwal,M.S. Arora

ORDER

Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)

1. These appeals relate to the classification of 3-ply, 5-ply and 7-ply laminated film and plastic multi laminated collapsible tubes. All 3 appeals involve common issues and are hence disposed of by this common order.

2. E/A 265/85-C : This appeal relates to the classification and rate of duty applicable to 3-ply laminated film, 5-ply laminated film, 7-ply laminated film and plastic collapsible multi-laminated tubes obtained from 7-ply laminated film. The facts of the case are that the appellants filed classification list 22/84 w.e.f. 2-8-1984 for the classification of the above mentioned products. A show cause notice was served upon them,

(1) alleging that 7-ply laminated film and collapsible tubes being composite articles are not eligible for exemption under Notification 182/82, CE dated 11-5-1982.

(2) seeking to classify 5-ply laminated films under T.I. 27 (7). No question was raised regarding classification of 3-ply laminates. The appellants replied that 5-ply and 7-ply laminated films are known as such in the trade and never known as aluminium foil and hence they cannot be classified under T.I. 27 (7), that aluminium foil is covered on bot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top