G.SANKARAN, S.G.JAIN, M.SANTHANAM
Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Uma Laminated Products (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent
G. Sankaran, Member (T)
1. The present proceedings arise out of the notice bearing F. No. 198/B/13/94/81-C X.5, dated 21st July, 1981 issued by the Central Government to the Respondents (hereinafter referred to as Uma Laminated) calling upon them to show cause why the Central Government, in exercise of its powers under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), should not set aside the Order-in-Appeal No. 68/81 dated 9-2-1981 passed by the Appellate Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Hyderabad and restore the Orders-in-Original dated 12-3-1980 and 5-8-1980 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad or pass orders as deemed fit. These proceedings have come to this Tribunal as transferred proceedings under Section 35-P of the Act and are being disposed of as if it were an appeal filed by the Central Government before the Tribunal.
2. Uma Laminated are manufacturers of "Polyethylene Coated Paper" and "Polyethylene Sandwiched Paper" using duty-paid kraft paper and duty-paid polyethylene granules as the main raw materials. Excise duty was being charged on these goods under Item No. 17 (2) of the Central Exci
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.