SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.JAYARAMAN, P.K.DESAI
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Memory Steel (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.M. Mondal,Willingdon Christian

ORDER

P.K. Desai, Member (J)

1. This appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal bearing No. V-2(72)2090/88, dated 27-10-1988 passed by the Collector of C. Excise (Appeals) setting aside the order in Original No. SRT-III/D-89/88, dated 7-6-1988. The department has come in appeal.

2. Heard Shri Mondal and Shri Willingdon Christian. Shri Mondal during the course of argument challenged the order of the Collector of Cen. Excise (Appeals) and submitted that the view taken by the Collector (Appeals) is not proper and that the order passed by the Asstt. Collector should be restored.

3. Considering the position, it appears that the demand raised is on account of wrong availment of modvat credit on Bazar Scrap of Iron and Steel. The credit was taken during the period from April, 1986 to September, 1986, for which a show cause notice demanding the duty amount was issued on 8-6-1987 by the Supdt. invoking the provisions of Rule 57-I. The matter was adjudicated by the Asstt. Collector who passed the order dated 7-6-1988 confirming the demand.

4. This Bench has been taking a consistent view that even for demanding reversal of the credit already taken under Rule 57-I, the provisions of Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top