SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.JAYARAMAN, P.K.DESAI
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Weldekar Laminates (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.M. Mondal,A. Hidayatullah, S.M. Paranjape

ORDER

R. Jayaraman, Member (T)

1. This is an appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-Ill, against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) bearing No. AMP-465/B-III-215/88 dated 22-7-1988 allowing the appeal of the respondents on merits.

2. Brief facts of the case for the purpose of disposal of this appeal can be stated as below.

3. The respondents are the manufacturers of decorative laminate sheets falling under Heading 39 of the Central Excise Tariff. They were receiving duty paid BOPP films classifiable under sub-heading 3902.31 for use in the manufacture of laminated sheets. They had availed of credit of duty paid on these films, since both the final product and the input were notified under the MOD VAT scheme. The department objected to the availment of the credit of the duty paid on these films used in the manufacture of laminated sheets on the ground that these films act as separators, while putting the sheets into the press and do not constitute as an input in the manufacturing process. These films prevent two layers of sheets from sticking together and they do not form part of the final product and hence cannot be treated as inputs. This could

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top