P.C.JAIN, S.L.PEERAN
Janta Ayurved Bhawan – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs – Respondent
S.L. Peeran, Member (J)
1. In this appeal, the appellants have sought for setting aside the order-in-original No. 25-C/86 dated 5-11-1986 passed by the Collector of Customs, New Delhi, by which, the Collector of Customs had confiscated the impugned goods Sufeed Sarah (Poppy Seeds - Khaskhas) under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as Act) imposition of Rs. 2.5 lakhs of Redemption fine and Rs. 10,000/- personal penalty under Section 112 of the Act.
2. The facts of the case as set out in the order-in-original are that the appellants filed Bill of Entry No. 1168 dated 29-9-1986 for the clearance of Sufeed Sarah (Poppy Seeds - Khaskhas) of declared value of Rs. 1,23,615/- CIF covered under Invoice No. 6/62/E/SCL/86-87 dated 21-8-1986 of M/s. Saeed & Co., Lahore. The appellants claimed the clearance of the goods under import under O.G.L. Appendix 6(1) of AM 85-88 Policy. The Customs covered the impugned goods under Entry No. 121 of Appendix 2 Part B of AM 85-88 Policy and for the clearance of which sought specific licence/CCP.
3. The Collector of Customs relied upon the letter No. 50/1/84-85/PC dated 25-6-1986 issued by C.C.I. & E., New Delhi, by which t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.