SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, S.L.PEERAN
Janta Ayurved Bhawan – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R. Madhav Rao,R.M. Ramchandani

ORDER

S.L. Peeran, Member (J)

1. In this appeal, the appellants have sought for setting aside the order-in-original No. 25-C/86 dated 5-11-1986 passed by the Collector of Customs, New Delhi, by which, the Collector of Customs had confiscated the impugned goods Sufeed Sarah (Poppy Seeds - Khaskhas) under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as Act) imposition of Rs. 2.5 lakhs of Redemption fine and Rs. 10,000/- personal penalty under Section 112 of the Act.

2. The facts of the case as set out in the order-in-original are that the appellants filed Bill of Entry No. 1168 dated 29-9-1986 for the clearance of Sufeed Sarah (Poppy Seeds - Khaskhas) of declared value of Rs. 1,23,615/- CIF covered under Invoice No. 6/62/E/SCL/86-87 dated 21-8-1986 of M/s. Saeed & Co., Lahore. The appellants claimed the clearance of the goods under import under O.G.L. Appendix 6(1) of AM 85-88 Policy. The Customs covered the impugned goods under Entry No. 121 of Appendix 2 Part B of AM 85-88 Policy and for the clearance of which sought specific licence/CCP.

3. The Collector of Customs relied upon the letter No. 50/1/84-85/PC dated 25-6-1986 issued by C.C.I. & E., New Delhi, by which t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top