I.J.RAO, D.C.MANDAL, G.P.AGARWAL
Steel Authority of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
D.C. Mandal, Member (T)
1. Two issues are required to be decided by us in this appeal. The same are :-
(i) Whether Raw Naptha obtained at concessional rate of Central Excise duty at Rs. 4.40 per K.L. in terms of Government of India's Notification No. 187/61-C.E., dated 23-12-1961 for the manufacture of fertilizer against L-6 licence, which was fed into the Plant to keep it running but not actually utilised in the manufacture of Calcium Ammonium Nitrate, a fertilizer, is eligible for the benefit of the Notification; and
(ii) Whether the demand for duty raised in the show cause notice dated 23-4-1984 for the Raw Naptha so used during the period from 1-4-1981 to 31-10-1983 in terms of Rule 196 of the Central Excise Rules, and the bond executed by the appellants, was barred by limitation?
2. The brief facts of the case, as stated in the Order-in-Original dated 5-12-1986 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Rourkela, are as follows :-
M/s. Steel Authority of India Limited, Fertilizer Plant, Rourkela (in short "SAIL") obtained Raw Naphtha falling under Item No. 6 of the Schedule to the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 on which the excise duty at a concessional rate of Rs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.