SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, D.C.MANDAL, G.P.AGARWAL
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Metrowood Engineering Works – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S. Sunder Rajan,Devon Parekh, Willingdon Christian, B. Shankar

ORDER

D.C. Mandal, Member

1. Brief facts in the cases in the above 3 appeals are as follows :-

(i) M/s. Metro Wood & Engineering Works Ltd., (Respondent No. 1) are engaged in the manufacture of Industrial Laminates (Electrical Insulators) and Decorative Laminates. Prior to 1-3-1986, they were paying Central Excise duty on these two products under Item 15-A(2) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the old Tariff). It is stated in the impugned order-in-appeal dated 24-10-1986 of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) that after introduction of the new Central Excise Tariff under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 w.e.f. 1-1-1986, they filed a classification list No. 1/85-86 effective from 1-3-1986 claiming classification of the Industrial Laminates (Electrical Insulators) under Heading 8546.00 chargeable to duty @ 15% ad valorem. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise classified the Industrial Laminates (Electrical Insulators) under Heading 3920.31 chargeable to duty @ 35% ad valorem and approved the aforesaid classification list after making modification to the above effect. The respondents challenged the order of the Assista

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top