SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, HARISH CHANDER, D.C.MANDAL
Kusum Products Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C. Chakraborty,A.S. Sundar Rajan

ORDER

D.C. Mandal, Member (T)

1. In this ROM application, the applicants have prayed for rectification of certain mistakes in the Tribunal's Order No. 740/88-C dated 16-9-1988. In paragraph-1 of the ROM application the applicants have stated that during the hearing of the appeal on 13-9-1988, Shri N.C. Chakraborty, authorised representative argued for the appellants whereas due to some communication gap, it appears, the name of Shri K.M. Lakhotia has been indicated instead of Shri N.C. Chakraborty. This point has also been reiterated by Shri N.C. Chakraborty while arguing on the ROM application before us. In the relevant column "present for the appellant" of the order sheet dated 13-9-1988 which was placed before the Bench hearing the appeal, the name of "Shri K.M. Lakhotia, consultant" was shown by the Court Master. In the circumstances, the name of Shri K.M. Lakhotia appeared in the Tribunal's Order instead of the name of Shri N.C. Chakraborty. This is a mistake apparent on record and is required to be rectified by substituting the name of Shri N.C. Chakraborty in place of Shri K.M. Lakhotia, wherever the latter occurs in the impugned order.

2. In paragraph 2 (a) of the ROM applicat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top