SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

I.J.RAO, G.P.AGARWAL, S.L.PEERAN
Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S. Bhangoo,V.M. Doiphode

ORDER

S.L. Peeran, Member (J)

1. The appellant M/s. Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. (Paper Division) Saila Khurd, District (Hoshiarpur) has filed this appeal under Section 35-B of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 against the impugned order in Annexure A-l passed by the Collector of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi rejecting their appeal against the order passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise Division, Jullundur in Annexure A-2 holding them liable for Rs. 8,46732 P. on the Fibre Recovery plant under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and not granting them the benefit of Notification No. 118/75-C.E.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant are engaged in manufacture of paper falling under Tariff Item 17 of the Central Excise Tariff. The raw materials have to pass to the stage of pulp before the finished stage of paper is attained. The process of preparation of pulp involves grinding the raw materials and making a paste after mixing in water. The water keeps on draining out leaving a thin paste sheet which subsequently requires the shape of a paper after passing through number of rolls arranged in series. The drained water is an effluent water wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top