SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.JAYARAMAN, P.K.DESAI
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Containers (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.P. Arya,D.D. Gwalani

ORDER

R. Jayaraman, Member (T)

1. This is an appeal filed by the department against the order of the Collector (Appeals) bearing No. V-2(83.12) 1794/88, dated 26-10-1988.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondents availed of the MOD VAT credit in respect of Aluminium Tubes without filing the proper declaration as required under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules. They availed of the MODVAT credit from Feb. 87 to Sep. 87. Since proper declaration was not filed in respect of the goods, namely aluminium tubes, show cause notice was issued on 2-2-1988 for recovering the credit taken under the MODVAT scheme during the aforesaid period. In the adjudication proceedings, initiated by the Assistant Collector, demand for Rs. 63,642.48 was confirmed under the provisions of Rule 57-I (1) of the Central Excise Rules. The respondents went in appeal before the Collector (Appeals). The Collector (Appeals) without going into the other merits of the appeal, allowed the appeal of the respondents on the ground that the demand is barred by time and hit by limitation laid down under Section 11A of the Act and the Supdt. was not competent to decide the issue of show cause notice. He, however, dir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top