SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.KALYANAM, K.S.VENKATARAMANI
Sundaram Clayton Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G. Sampath,K.K. Bhatia

ORDER

K.S. Venkataramani, Member (T)

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 29-2-1988 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras, by which he had allowed an application filed by the Department before him, under Section 35E(4) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 against the order of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Hosur Division, holding that the Assistant Collector, Hosur, was wrong in allowing MODVAT credit to the appellants on the Tool kits supplied by them along with the Mopeds manufactured and cleared by the appellants.

2. The appellants are manufacturers of Two Wheelers (Mopeds) at Hosur. They were availing of MOD VAT credit under Rule 57-A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 from 1-3-1986 onwards. They filed a declaration for the purpose as required under Rule 57G for Tool kits as one of the inputs for their final product, viz. Mopeds. A Show Cause Notice was issued to them on 17-2-1987 as to why the Tool kits should not be treated as not an input and the MODVAT credit denied to them. The Assistant Collector after hearing the appellants passed an order on 16-7-1987 confirming that the Tool kits which were supplied along with the Moped

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top