CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
K.L. Rekhi, Harish Chander, JJ.
Singh Radio and Electronics -Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs -Respondent
Order Nos. 345-346/1988-A Appeal Nos. C/2452/87 AND C/2473/87-A, 345-346 of 1988, C/2452 of 1987, C/2473 of 1987
Decided On : 20-05-1988
Harish Chander, Member (J)
1. Since both the appeals emerge from the same impugned order and as such are disposed of by this consolidated order. The appellants M/s. Singh Radio and Electronics had imported 140 packages vide Bill of Entry No. 50020 dated 15-12-1983. The description of the contents of the said 140 Pkgs. had been declared in Col. No. 6 of the said Bill of Entry as 'Tape Recorder parts-Sub-assembly - as per invoice attached." As per invoice No. DMER-10, dated 31-8-1983 of M/s of entry, the unit price per sub-assembly was Japanese Yens 1030 G
National Pana Sonic
Model No. RX 49 60F
Power - Sons -
AC Z 110, Battery -6-
Matsushita Electric Co. Ltd.
Made in Japan.
the station Dials, fitted on the front covers, were found bearing markings BM-MW-SWI-SW2-4 Band Stereo Radio Cassette Recorder". These 868 packages had been cleared from Bombay Customs vide Bombay Customs House Import Department S. No. 3030 dated November 83 cash HC 408 dated 1-12-1983, Bill of Lading No. F.3/31-8-1983 as 'tape recorder parts" against Import Licence No. P/S/1934128 dated 17-8-1982 and P/W/0356055 dated 29-7-1982 and were seized under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 by the Collector of Customs, New Delhi. On the basis of Invoice Nos. BMER 5, 6, 7, 8
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.