SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

H.R.SYIEM, G.P.AGARWAL
Hindustan Equipment Engg. Co. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.A. Rangaswamy,J. Gopinath

ORDER

G.P. Agarwal, Member (J)

1. This appeal is directed against the impugned Order-in-Appeal passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay.

2. Factual backdrop : M/s. Hindustan Equipment Engineering Co., appellants herein and M/s. Krishna Co. are associate firms (the sole proprietor of the former firm that is to say, appellants firm has a 50% partnership share in the latter firm). It is the case of the department that the appellants imported a consignment of 12 cases of Synchronizer Cones and presented for its clearance licence No. 0314617, dated 6-1-1982 stood in the name of M/s. Chandiramani, Delhi and 2028886, dated 21-1-1981 stood In the name of M/s. Krishna Co. The unit price for the Synchroniser Cones was shown In the import document at US $ 3.49 per piece. The importers produced two telex messages exchanged between Shri S.N. Goenka of M/s. Krishna Co. and M/s. For Export. M/s. For Export has agreed to supply M/s. Krishna Co. the goods at the price of US $ 3.69 CIF each provided M/s. Krishna Co. receives a commission of US 20 Cents per piece from M/s. For Export. From this correspondence the department tentatively formed an opinion that although the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top