SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.R.SYIEM, G.P.AGARWAL
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Universal Radiators Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.N. Nigam,A. Hasan

ORDER

H.R. Syiem, Member (T)

1. The facts are as follows : the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore, passed on order on a refund claim for Rs. 62,063.54 filed by M/s. Universal Radiators Ltd. and sanctioned the amount of Rs. 28,861.26 and rejected the rest. The Assistant Collector, under orders of the Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore by virtue of Section 35E(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, made an application to the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras and submitted that the assessees had not been able to establish that the goods, radiators, coolers, heat exchanger, had been used as parts of diesel engines and that the officer deputed for verification had not been able to get evidence that the goods in respect of which the refund claim was sanctioned were used as parts of diesel engines, or were parts of diesel engines. There was no proof that the goods were exclusively used as parts of diesel engines and, therefore, the respondents were not entitled to exemption under Notification No. 55/75 the applicant Assistant Coll. pleaded that the sanction of the refund be set aside.

2. The Collector (Appeals) received the authorisation of the Collect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top