SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.T.RAGHAVACHARI, V.P.GULATI, P.C.JAIN
Collector of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
United Paper Products – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.C. Chakraborty,Shankar Ghose

ORDER

V.T. Raghavachari, Member (J)

1. Under classification list No. 90/82 effective from 22.4.1982 the respondents M/s. United Paper Products claimed benefit under Notification No. 144/82 dated 22.4.1982 in respect of "corrugated 5 ply printed cardboard cases made out of duty paid kraft paper" manufactured by them and classifiable under Item 17(4) CET. Under order dated 11.10.1983 the Assistant Collector granted approval without benefit of the said notification. on appeal the said order was set aside by the Collector (Appeals) under his order dated 17.9.1984 under which he extended benefit of exemption under the notification. The appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, Patna is against that order.

2. While making his submissions on behalf of the appellant Collector, Shri LC. Chakraborty made a request that he should be granted time to take instructions from the Collector for advancing an argument that the subject goods would be printed cartons and for that reason be Ineligible for the concession claimed. His submission was that under the proviso to the notification, benefit would not be available in respect of printed boxes as well as printed cartons, but that the Collector (Appe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top