SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

H.R.SYIEM, HARISH CHANDER, P.C.JAIN
Standard Industrial Engineering Co. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G. Prabhakara Sastry,J.N. Nigam

ORDER

H.R. Syiem, Member (T)

1. There are two orders in these two appeals : one is order-in-original No. 10/85, dated 30-9-1985 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Guntur and the other, order-in-original No. 7/85, dated 27-7-1985 passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Guntur.

2. The dispute is the same in both the cases. The appellants, M/s. Standard Industrial Engineering made what the Central Excise say were goods viz. purlins, trusses, rafters bracings etc. from MS plates, channels, angles, rounds, supplied to them by another person. The department say that the trusses, purlins, bracings were all goods assessable under Item 68, because they were fabricated from the angles, MS plates, channels etc. and that in the fabrication, the finished goods have come to acquire new names, characters and uses and that the processing constituted a manufacture within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act.

3. At the hearing, the learned counsel for M/s. Standard Industrial argued that the Tribunal had already decided this dispute in MANU/CE/0100/1986 : 1986 (25) ELT 580 re: Aruna Industries; and the Collector has accepted that decision of this Tribunal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top