SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.D.JHA, D.C.MANDAL
Eagle Mineral Products – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.F. Patel,J.K. Chander

ORDER

D.C. Mandal, Member (T)

1. By the impugned order the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) has disposed of five Orders-in-original in which Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Nadiad confirmed demands for differential duty of Central Excise. The dates of the show cause notices, periods covered by the show cause notices, Tariff Item under which the goods were cleared, Tariff Items under which the differential duty was demanded in the show cause notices and the Tariff Items under which the demands were confirmed by the Assistant Collector are given in the following table :-

xxx

Collector (Appeals) has rejected the appeals filed before him by the appellants against the Orders-in-original of the Assistant Collector on the ground that the demands were confirmed on the basis of the test results of the samples drawn from the goods manufactured by the appellants and as such, there was no merit in the appeals.

2. The appellants prayed for introduction of certain additional documents to which no objection was raised by the learned J.D.R. for the respondent. Additional documents were, therefore, allowed to be introduced as evidence.

3. Arguing for the appellants Shri A. F. Patel, learned A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top