SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.R.SYIEM, G.P.AGARWAL
S. A. E. (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


ORDER

G.P. Agarwal, Member (J)

1. Out of the six appeals in hand, five appeals relate to classification of the goods and one appeal relates to the rejection of refund claims lodged by the appellants.

2. Factual backdrop: It is the case of the appellants that they accept on contract basis from the State Electricity Boards, in the country to install Electric Power Transmission Towers made of Steel for public distribution of Electric Power. For this purpose, they received from the Steel Authority of India Ltd., Tata Iron Steel Co. Ltd., and Indian Iron Steel Co. Ltd., duty paid steel angles falling under Tariff Item 26AA of the C.F.T. in their factory , cut them to size, punched and galvanised them and cleared them from the factory, and after clearance from the factory these steel angles were used in the construction of steel Power Transmission Towers of the State Electricity Boards, Government Body's like National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. and National Hydro Electric Power Corporation Ltd. They submitted their five classification lists contending that since the steel angles had already paid duty under T.I. 26AA, and mere cutting, punching, and galvanising the cut-to-size angles

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top