SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.GOPAL HEGDE, R.JAYARAMAN
Prem Narayan Doulatram Verma – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs & Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harbans Singh,C.P. Arya

ORDER

K. Gopal Hegde, Member (J)

1. The appeal 1427/83 arises out of order-in-original bearing No. 54/Collr./1983, dated 6-10-1983 passed by the Collector of Customs, Ahmedabad.

The appeal No. 110/83 arises out of and is directed against the order-in-original bearing No. 6/Gold/1983 dated 6-10-1983 passed by the Collector of Central Excise/Customs, Ahmedabad.

2. The appellant in both the appeals is one and the same person. The respondent is also the same. Both the appeals involve identical facts and both the impugned orders are identically worded excepting that in the appeal 1427/83 the Collector had held the appellant guilty and is liable for penalty under the provisions of Section 112 of the Customs Act and in the appeal GC 110/83 the Collector of Customs had held that the appellant is guilty and is liable for penalty under Section 74 of the Gold (Control) Act. Hence we have clubbed both these appeals and heard together and hence this common order.

3. The subject of challenge in both the appeals is the imposition of penalty of Rs. one lakh under the Customs Act and imposition of penalty of Rs. one lakh under the Gold (Control) Act.

4. The material facts required for the disposal of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top