SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.P.AGARWAL
Collector of Customs & Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Shri Balkrishan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nisha Chaturvedi

ORDER

G.P. Agarwal, Member (J)

1. Not satisfied with the impugned Order passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), setting aside the order of confiscation and penalty passed by the Assistant Collector, the Revenue has filed the present appeal.

2. Factual backdrops: Preventive Staff on 20.6.82, apprehended the respondent after he had taken delivery of three bales from the Railway Station and on examination of the contents of these bales 333 pieces of garments of different textures, sizes, designs, and colours valued at Rs. 10,0467- were recovered. Since according to the Revenue the respondent failed to produce any evidence in support of the lawful acquisition/ possession etc., of the said goods, said to be of foreign origin, the same were seized. After the usual adjudication proceedings, the Assistant Collector ordered for the confiscation of the seized goods under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962 with an option to redeem the same on a payment of a redemption fine of Rs. 5,000/- in lieu of confiscation besides a personal penalty of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 112, ibid. Against this Order, the respondent went in appeal before the Collector of Customs (Appeals) New Delhi, who allow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top