SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAURI SHANKER MURTHY, K.L.REKHI
Madhavnagar Cotton Mills Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Pune – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Parthasarthy,B.R. Tripathi

ORDER

K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)

1. On hearing both sides, we observe that the appellants received the impugned order on 9.9.1985. As per the postal receipt, their appeal Was received in the Registry on 9.12.1985, i.e. within the prescribed period of three months. The appeal being in time, the application for condonation of delay is, infructuous and is dismissed as such.

2. We then heard both sides on merits of the case. We find that the appellants manufacture cotton fabrics. Among their customers,, there are five industrial customers who require fabrics of a particular sort, quality and construction for their respective industrial use. Such fabrics are manufactured by the appellants against specific contracts entered into with these customers and are supplied exclusively to the respective customer. Some customers, like M/s. Leauko Plast, require that the fabrics to be supplied to them should be thoroughly checked, meter by meter, before delivery. The appellants arrange such checking and realise special checking charges (a) 25P to 50P per meter from such customer. In the case of other industrial customers, the appellants say that they manufacture the required special quality fabrics in lo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top