Back
S.KALYANAM, K.S.VENKATARAMANI
M. V. Chidambaram – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Madras – Respondent
S. Kalyanam, Member
1. Since the above appeals arise out of a common order they are taken up together and disposed of by a single order. The appeals are directed against the order of the Addl. Collector of Customs, Madras dated 20.9.1985 imposing a penalty of Rs. 75,000/- on the Master of the Vessel 'M.V. Chidambaram' (Appellant in C/57/86), Rs. 25,000/- on appellant Shri Gajraj' (Appellant in C/60/86) and Rs. 50,000/- on the shipping agent K.P.V. Shaik Mohd. Rowther
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
