SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.VENKATESAN, K.L.REKHI, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Marketing Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vineet Ohri,S.L. Rajgarhia

ORDER

V.T. Ragha Yachari, Member (J)

1. The respondents, M/s Industrial Marketing Corporation manufacture Varnished Fibre Glass Cloth, Varnished Sleevings and Varnished Fibre Glass Tapes. Under his order dated 25-7-1981 the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Bombay Division C-II classified the first two products under Tariff Item 22B-CET and the last one under Tariff Item 68-CET. The respondents preferred an appeal in respect of the classification of the first two items. Under his order dated 23-10-1981, the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Bombay, set aside the order of the Assistant Collector in the said matter and held that the said two products were also classifiable under Tariff Item No. 68-CET. Under notice dated 21-9-1982 the Central Government, in exercise of its powers under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, as it then stood, indicated to the respondents that it proposed to revise the order of the Appellate Collector and restore the classification to Tariff Item 22B-CET. Under the said notice the respondents were called upon to show cause why the said variation should not be ordered. The respondents sent their reply reiterating their contentions ra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top