SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.VENKATESAN, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI, D.C.MANDAL
Kwality Sales Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L. Beri,Dolly Saxena

ORDER

D.C. Mandal, Member (T)

1. This was a Revision Application originally filed before the Central Government, which, on transfer to this Tribunal, was treated as an appeal.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that on 7-12-1976 Central Excise Officers of Range-III, Ludhiana visited the factory of the appellants and found that they were manufacturing "Axle Studs" without obtaining Central Excise Licence in contravention of Rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Officers seized 59-1/2 gross axle studs valued at Rs. 3,411/- found in the factory. A notice was issued to the appellants on 9-2-1977 to show cause to the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Ludhiana as to why penalty should not be imposed on them and why Central Excise duty should not be charged on the seized goods under Rule 210 of the Central Excise Rules for contravention of Rule 174 ibid. Following the guidelines laid down in the Instruction No. 64/CE/77 (I-Nut Bolts) dated 2-3-1977 issued by the Collectorate of Central Excise, Chandigarh, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise held that the goods manufactured by the appellants were covered under Item 52 of the Central Excise Tariff. He confiscated th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top