SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.D.JHA, S.DUGGAL, K.PRAKASH ANAND
Bombay Food (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C. Rohatgi

ORDER

S. Duggal, Member (J)

1. The issue involved in this appeal, which was originally a revision petition before the Central Government, is as to the availability of benefit of Notification No. 119/75-C.E., dated April 30, 1975 to appellants, in respect to the manufacturing process they carried out on brass rods received from their customers, by making valves and nuts, meant for different parts of LPG cylinders.

2. The facts as set out in the appeal, and also as indicated by the Order-in-Appeal, reveal that the appellants received from certain named customers brass rods by way of raw material for the manufacture of forged nuts and valve body forged and machined on job basis during period 1-7-1975 to 31-12-1975. They paid duty on job work charges received by them from their customers, in terms of Notification No. 119/75, while the excise authorities took the view subsequently that value of the raw material had also to be included, inasmuch as the appellants manufacture complete equipment for cylinders, out of the raw material received from the customers, and as such, they had erroneously been allowed benefit of aforesaid Notification. Thus, a short levy demand on account of duty, on f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top