SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, HARISH CHANDER, K.PRAKASH ANAND
N. P. Venkataraman Iyer – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.R. Mehta,A.S. Sundar Rajan

ORDER

G. Sankaran, Member (T)

1. The captioned appeal was originally filed as a revision application before the Central Government which, under Section 131-B of the Customs Act, 1962, has come as transferred proceedings to this Tribunal for disposal as if it were an appeal filed before it.

2. The facts of the case, briefly stated, are that the appellants imported from Malaysia a consignment of coconut oil. The goods were described as "white coconut oil, unrefined" in the bill of entry filed for their clearance. They were allowed to be cleared for home consumption, without payment of additional duty of customs, on execution of a bond bending chemical test. On 23-9-1978, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Madras wrote to the appellants informing them that the goods were found on test to be refined coconut oil and hence liable to additional duty of customs of Rs. 15,000/-. The appellants contested the demand which, however, was confirmed by the Assistant Collector by his order dated 28-4-1979. The appeal against this order was dismissed by the Appellate Collector by his order of 1-7-1981. It is against this order that the appellants are now before us.

3. Before we set out the rival conte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top