SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, H.R.SYIEM, S.C.JAIN
Lotus Inks – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Venkataraman,V. Lakshmikumaran

ORDER

G. Sankaran, Member (T)

1. The captioned appeal was initially filed as a Revision Application before the Central Government which, in terms of Section 131-B of the Customs Act, 1962, has come as transferred proceedings to this Tribunal for disposal as if it were an appeal presented before it.

2. The appellants imported a consignment of "Alkali Blue Flushing" which was charged by the Madras Customs authorities to additional (countervailing) customs duty with reference to Item No. 14-D of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule (CET). The appellants contended before the Assistant Collector that the product was not usable in any dyeing process since it was insoluble in water for application to the material to be dyed. The product was applied through the medium of oil and, therefore, dyeing as in the case of dyestuffs would not be possible. On this basis, they contended that the product was correctly classifiable under Item No. 14-I(i)(ii) of the CET. This claim did not find favour with the Assistant Collector. The appeal against the Assistant Collector's order also did not meet with success. It is the Appellate Collector's order dated 20th June, 1981 which is under challenge before us.

3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top