SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.B.GUJRAL, M.GOURI SHANKAR MURTHY, K.L.REKHI
Pefco Foundry Chemicals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Pune – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Habbu,A.K. Jain

ORDER

M. Gouri Shankar Murthy, Member (J)

1. The allegations, in so far material in this Appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), were-

(a) the Appellant had been making castings of diverse types for various industries since 1973. The castings had always been classified under Item 25 of the 1st Schedule to the Act, to wit, "iron in any crude form including pig iron, scrap iron, molten iron or iron cast in any other shape or size," right from 1976 and exempted from duty under Notification No. 74/62-CE, dated 24-4-62, as amended by Notification No. 119/64, dated 27-6-1964.

(b) earlier, the Appellant filed a classification list on 15th April, 1981 claiming exemption in respect of "Iron in any crude form-cast iron castings (semi-finished, proof machined or partially machined) for-

(1) * * *

(2) * * *

(3) Cylinder liners proof machined to Part No. CC-F-3 (Rev.!).

(4) Cylinder liners proof machined to Part No. 10123116 which is not identifiable part in that it is partially machined only and not ready for use."

under the aforesaid notification No. 74/62 and it was duly approved by the Asstt. Collector in November, 1981; (Exhibit F in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top