SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.B.GUJRAL, S.D.JHA, A.J.F.D’SOUZA
Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta – Appellant
Versus
American Refrigerator Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Abdul Khader, V. Lakshmikumaran,N. Khaitan

ORDER

S.D. Jha, Member (J)

1. The question for decision in these seven appeals and the Cross-objection filed by the Respondents is whether 'D.K. Coils, Condenser coils, shell and Tube Condenser, Chillers, Head Exchangers, heat inter-changers, I.C.C Accumulation coils of different sizes (hereinafter referred as goods) manufactured by the respondents are classifiable under Tariff Item No. 29-A(3) of the Central Excise Tariff or under T. I. No. 68 ibid and whether any part of the refund claimed by the Respondents is time-barred.

2. The respondents Company is inter alia engaged in the manufacture of goods described above since 1962. The goods were classified by the jurisdictional Assistant Collector of Central Excise under T.I. No. 29A(3) of the C.E.T. Later the respondents on the basis of some Court judgment applied for refund claiming that the goods were not classifiable under Item 29A(3) but under Item 68. The refunds claimed numbering seven related to period 1-7-1977 to 20-12-1980 and totalled in all to Rs. 22,32,785.84. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta by his order dated 10-3-1982 rejected all the claims for refund and held that the goods in question were classifia

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top