SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.B.GUJRAL, K.L.REKHI, V.S.RAMA DEVI
Gujarat Machinery Manufacturers Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Baroda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.D. Khosla,N.V. Raghavan Iyer

ORDER

1. The subject three appeals arise out of the common Order-in-Appeal which was passed in respect of three Orders-in-Original Since a common issue is involved in all the three appeals, they were heard together.

2. The facts in brief are that the appellants have a Research & Development Department in their factory. They erected a pilot plant in this department for R & D work. They manufactured about 70% of the components of this pilot plant in their own factory and bought the remaining 307 or so of the components from outside The point to be decided in these three appeals is whether the appellants are liable to pay any Central excise duty on the pilot plant or on the components of the said plant manufactured by themselves In order to facilitate a proper understanding of the issue involved, we reproduce below the relevant exemption notification :- reproduce

"In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Excise Rules 1944, and in supersession of the notification No. dated 1-3-1975, the Central Govt. hereby exempts goods falling under Item No.68 of First Schedule to the under Item No.68 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act 1944 (1 of 1944)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top