Back
S.GROVER, G.SANKARAN, S.DUGGAL
International Conveyors Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay – Respondent
S. Grover, Vice- President
1. M/s International Conveyors Limited, a Public Limited Company, in short mentioned as the Company, filed a Revision Application (R.A.) before the Additional Secretary, Government of India, Department of Revenue on 10th of April 1981 against the Order No. V-2(68)/688/79/8620 dated 23rd of October 1980 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) Bombay. The related Order of Adjudication was of the Superintendent of Central Excise, Aurangabad dated 21st/24th of March 1979. The said R.A. came to be transferred to the Tribunal under Section 35-P of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 hereinafter referred as the Act, as an Appeal, and is being accordingly disposed of as such.
2. 1978 for their product which they described as under :
P.V.C. Fire Resistant Anti-Static Solid Woven Coal Conveyor Belting/P.V.C. Food Conveyor Belting.
3. While submitting the AL-4, the Company claimed that its products fell under Tariff Item 68 of the C.E.T.
4. On 24th October 1978, the Company was required to explain the manufacturing process and raw material to be used. Necessarily, reply was filed on 19th November 1978.
5. A show cause notice was issued on 12th of Janua
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
