SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.K.USHA, S.S.KANG, C.N.B.NAIR
Panalfa Dongwon India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Parthasarathy,S.M. Tata

ORDER

Per Justice K.K. Usha : The appeal is at the instance of the importer M/s. Panalfa Dongwon India Ltd. The challenge is against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 29.8.2002. The issue arising for consideration is whether lump sum royalty of US $ 6,50,000 payable as consideration for (i) training of personnel, (ii) furnishing of technical information and (iii) utilisation of intellectual property rights and royalty of 2.5% on the net selling price of each licensed product manufactured and sold are required to be added to the invoice value of the capital goods, raw materials etc. imported by the appellant under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

2. The appellant company was formed on a joint venture agreement dated 3.2.1996 between M/s. Panalfa Investments Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, M/s. DCM Daewoo Motors Ltd. New Delhi and M/s. Dongwon Metals Industries Co. Ltd. Korea. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement the appellant was set up to manufacture, assemble and sell complete exhaust systems including catalytic converter. The parties have entered into an agreement of Cooperation and Technical Licence. Under the terms of the agreement the appellant was l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top