SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.R.SHARMA, P.S.BAJAJ
Shiwalya Spinning & Weaving Mills (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Amritsar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P. Asthana, Ms. Reena Khair, Himanshu Jain,Atul Dikshit

ORDER

Per G.R. Sharma :

M/s. Shiwalya Spinning Weaving Mills (P) Ltd. and M/s. Shiwalya Trading Coprn. have filed the captioned two appeals being aggrieved by the orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner confirming demands for duty as also penalties imposed. Since the issue in both the appeals is the same, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellants imported certain consignments of acrylic staple fibre and declared them to be of Taiwanese origin. They filed Bills of Entry. The goods were cleared on payment of duty. Enquiries later on conducted revealed that the goods were of Thailand origin on which anti dumping duty was leviable in terms of Notification No. 81/97. The appellants paid the duty and also paid 25% of the penalty imposed within one month from the date of the order.

3. Arguing the case for the appellant Shri L.P. Asthana, Ld. Counsel submitted that the appellants had paid higher amount of anti-dumping duty which was provisionally determined but subsequently was reduced. He, therefore, submitted that this needs re-calculation of duty and refund of the amount paid in excess. Ld. Counsel refe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top