SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, J.H.JOGLEKAR
Ajanta Industries – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vipin Jain, Vishal Agarwal,A.K. Jain

ORDER

Per J.H. Joglekar : These two appeals are filed against the same order of the Commissioner. The facts being common they are being disposed off vide this single order.

2. M/s. Ajanta Industries were merchant exporters. They were holders of an advance licence enabling them to import 100% mulberry raw silk. M/s. Hetampuria Textiles was a proprietary unit owned by Anand Agarwal. They were traders and commission agent dealing in many other articles and raw silk. Shri Agarwal placed an order on M/s. Peer Hill Limited, Hong Kong, for supply of 219 bales of mulberry raw silk to M/s. Oceanic Export, Bombay. The goods arrived sometime at the end of October, 1995 and an IGM was filed on 01.11.1995 showing the importer as M/s. Oceanic Export citing bill of lading dated 22.10.1995. The goods were not cleared for quite sometime and were lying in the docks. As per the statement of the shipping agent M/s. Oceanic Exports requested them not to issue delivery orders in their name. On 04.12.1995 the shipping agent requested their agents abroad for amendment of the manifest showing consignee as Ajanta Industries. M/s. Oceanic Exports gave their NOC for this amendment. An amendment application was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top